The representation of explicit motor sequence knowledge.

by: R Knee, S Thomason, J Ashe, DT Willingham

Mem Cognit, Vol. 35, No. 2. (March 2007), pp. 326-333.

View FullText article

Pubmed, Hubmed

Reviews [Write a review of this article]

There are no reviews of this article

Find related articles from these CiteULike users

sternshein, VisionLab (group)

Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

brian, imitation, jessica, nichola, sequence_learning

Abstract

Much research has investigated the representation of implicitly learned motor sequences: Do subjects learn sequences of stimuli, responses, response locations, or some combination? Most of the work on this subject indicates that when sequences are learned implicitly, it is in terms of response locations. The present work investigated the representation of explicitly learned motor sequences. In four experiments, we found consistent evidence that explicitly learned sequences are represented in terms of stimulus locations. This conclusion held true for both self-report measures (subjects said that they learned stimuli) and performance measures, but when stimuli changed, performance degraded. We interpret these data in a multiple-memory-systems framework.

@article{citeulike:1525028, abstract = {Much research has investigated the representation of implicitly learned motor sequences: Do subjects learn sequences of stimuli, responses, response locations, or some combination? Most of the work on this subject indicates that when sequences are learned implicitly, it is in terms of response locations. The present work investigated the representation of explicitly learned motor sequences. In four experiments, we found consistent evidence that explicitly learned sequences are represented in terms of stimulus locations. This conclusion held true for both self-report measures (subjects said that they learned stimuli) and performance measures, but when stimuli changed, performance degraded. We interpret these data in a multiple-memory-systems framework.}, address = {University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22904-4400, USA.}, author = {Knee, R. and Thomason, S. and Ashe, J. and Willingham, D. T. }, citeulike-article-id = {1525028}, issn = {0090-502X}, journal = {Mem Cognit}, keywords = {brian, imitation, jessica, nichola, sequence\_learning}, month = {March}, number = {2}, pages = {326--333}, posted-at = {2007-07-31 15:09:46}, priority = {2}, title = {The representation of explicit motor sequence knowledge.}, url = {http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17645173}, volume = {35}, year = {2007} }

RIS record

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:1525028 L3 - citeulike-article-id:1525028 N2 - Much research has investigated the representation of implicitly learned motor sequences: Do subjects learn sequences of stimuli, responses, response locations, or some combination? Most of the work on this subject indicates that when sequences are learned implicitly, it is in terms of response locations. The present work investigated the representation of explicitly learned motor sequences. In four experiments, we found consistent evidence that explicitly learned sequences are represented in terms of stimulus locations. This conclusion held true for both self-report measures (subjects said that they learned stimuli) and performance measures, but when stimuli changed, performance degraded. We interpret these data in a multiple-memory-systems framework. IS - 2 JF - Mem Cognit SN - 0090-502X AD - University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22904-4400, USA. EP - 333 TI - The representation of explicit motor sequence knowledge. VL - 35 SP - 326 KW - brian KW - imitation KW - jessica KW - nichola KW - sequence_learning AU - Knee, R AU - Thomason, S AU - Ashe, J AU - Willingham, DT PY - 2007/03// UR - http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17645173 ER -

RIS BibTeX