registrieren | anmelden | FAQ      [?] 
CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Recent | Unread | Search | Authors | Tags | Export

Ports in Perspective: Some Comparative Materials on Roman Merchant Ships and Ports

by: George W Houston
American Journal of Archaeology, Vol. 92, No. 4. (1988), pp. 553-564.


View FullText article


X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

There are no reviews of this article

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Abstract

Very large merchant vessels (500 tons burden or more) and elaborate port facilities certainly existed in the Roman world, and they have attracted much attention in recent years. It is important, however, to provide an accurate context for such spectacular technical achievements: do they represent the norm, or are they uncommon, or even highly anomalous? In the absence of documentary evidence, we can make good use of comparative materials from other preindustrial contexts. Post-Roman merchant fleets regularly consist overwhelmingly of smaller vessels, often carrying small quantities of a large variety of items. Port facilities in these contexts are generally minimal, and such practices as beaching and offloading into lighters are common. It is argued here that most Roman merchant vessels were small (i.e., below 100 tons), and that man-made port facilities were both small and unusual in the Roman Empire. Evidence from the ancient world, including wrecks known from underwater excavations and numerous literary, legal, and epigraphical texts, supports precisely the picture of ancient shipping we would predict on the basis of the comparative material.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record



RIS BibTeX
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.