A proposal for comparative evaluation of automatic annotation for geo-referenced documents

@misc{citeulike:2842592, abstract = {INTRODUCTION Organised evaluation campaigns such as the Text Retrieval Conference (TREC) for information retrieval [9], the Document Understanding Conference (DUC) for document summarization [7], and the Message Understanding Conference (MUC) for information extraction [3] have not only proven to be an important and effective stimulus for research, but also served to bring together members of the academic and industrial research communities. These campaigns have resulted in large-scale...}, author = {Clough, P. and Sanderson, M. }, citeulike-article-id = {2842592}, keywords = {annotation, disambiguation, evaluation, geocoding}, posted-at = {2008-05-28 21:03:18}, priority = {3}, title = {A proposal for comparative evaluation of automatic annotation for geo-referenced documents}, url = {http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/clough04proposal.html}, year = {2004} }

TY - GEN ID - citeulike:2842592 L3 - citeulike-article-id:2842592 TI - A proposal for comparative evaluation of automatic annotation for geo-referenced documents N2 - INTRODUCTION Organised evaluation campaigns such as the Text Retrieval Conference (TREC) for information retrieval [9], the Document Understanding Conference (DUC) for document summarization [7], and the Message Understanding Conference (MUC) for information extraction [3] have not only proven to be an important and effective stimulus for research, but also served to bring together members of the academic and industrial research communities. These campaigns have resulted in large-scale... KW - annotation KW - disambiguation KW - evaluation KW - geocoding AU - Clough, P AU - Sanderson, M PY - 2004/// UR - http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/clough04proposal.html ER -