registrieren | anmelden | FAQ      [?] 
CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Recent | Unread | Search | Authors | Tags | Export

Possibility of extensive neutral evolution under stabilizing selection with special reference to nonrandom usage of synonymous codons.

by: M Kimura
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 78, No. 9. (September 1981), pp. 5773-5777.


View FullText article


X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

There are no reviews of this article

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Abstract

The rate of evolution in terms of the number of mutant substitutions in a finite population is investigated assuming a quantitative character subject to stabilizing selection, which is known to be the most prevalent type of natural selection. It is shown that, if a large number of segregating loci (or sites) are involved, the average selection coefficient per mutant under stabilizing selection may be exceedingly small. These mutants are very slightly deleterious but nearly neutral, so that mutant substitutions are mainly controlled by random drift, although the rate of evolution may be lower as compared with the situation in which all the mutations are strictly neutral. This is treated quantitatively by using the diffusion equation method in population genetics. A model of random drift under stabilizing selection is then applied to the problem of "nonrandom" or unequal usage of synonymous codons, and it is shown that such nonrandomness can readily be understood within the framework of the neutral mutation--random drift hypothesis (the neutral theory, for short) of molecular evolution.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record



RIS BibTeX
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.