registrieren | anmelden | FAQ      [?] 
CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Recent | Unread | Search | Authors | Tags | Export

Strong region-specific heterogeneity in base composition evolution on the Drosophila X chromosome.

by: Wen-Ya Y Ko, Shengfu Piao, Hiroshi Akashi
Genetics (17 March 2006)


View FullText article


X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

There are no reviews of this article

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Abstract

Fluctuations in base composition appear to be prevalent in Drosophila and mammal genome evolution, but their time-scale, genomic breadth, and causes remain obscure. Here, we study base composition evolution within the X chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster and five of its close relatives. Substitutions were inferred for 14 telomeric and nine non-telomeric X chromosome loci on six extant and two ancestral lineages using a maximum likelihood method. Heterogeneity in GC content evolution is highly localized both within the genome and within the phylogenetic tree. In the lineages leading to D. yakuba and D. orena, GC content at silent sites is increasing rapidly near telomeres, but is decreasing in more proximal (non-telomeric) regions. D. orena shows a 17-fold excess of GC-increasing synonymous changes within a small (~130kb) telomeric region. Intron GC content increases are consistent with fluctuations in mutational processes, but greater GC elevation at synonymous sites suggest contributions of biased gene conversion and/or natural selection. The D. yakuba lineage shows a less extreme elevation of GC content distributed over a wider genetic region (~1.2Mb). A lack of change in GC content for most introns within this region suggests a role of natural selection in regional base composition evolution.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record



RIS BibTeX
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.