| registrieren | anmelden | FAQ | [?] |
Food Sharing Among Ache Foragers: Tests of Explanatory Hypotheses [and Comments and Reply]by: Hillard Kaplan, Kim Hill, Rowe V CadeliƱa, Brian Hayden, David C Hyndman, Richard J Preston, Eric A Smith, David E Stuart, David R Yesner
Current Anthropology, Vol. 26, No. 2. (1985), pp. 223-246.
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
There are no reviews of this article
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
AbstractThis paper aims to describe and explain aspects of food sharing among Ache hunter-gatherers of eastern Paraguay. Food sharing has been widely held to be a fundamental feature of the hunting and gathering way of life and has been hypothesized to have played a major role in the evolution of language, intelligence, and the sexual division of labor. The very general question that guided the research is: What factors are responsible for the evolution of food sharing among adult conspecifics, and how can we account for the variation among groups in the extent to which food is shared? Five alternative hypotheses concerning the evolution of adult-adult food sharing are reviewed and analyzed in terms of the competing predictions they generate. These hypotheses invoke (1) kin selection, (2) tolerated theft, (3) temporal reciprocity, (4) cooperative acquisition of food resources, and (5) conservation of resources. For meat and honey, the resources the Ache share most, the data conform to the predictions of the tolerated-theft and temporal-reciprocity hypotheses, with some qualifications. Long-term differences in productivity between foragers suggest that reciprocity is not completely balanced. The implications of these results for a general theory of food sharing are discussed.
BibTeX record
RIS record