What really is going on? Review of situation awareness models for individuals and teams

@article{citeulike:2896241, abstract = {The concept of situation awareness (SA) is frequently described in the literature. Theoretically, it remains predominantly an individual construct and the majority of the models presented describe SA from an individual perspective. In comparison, team SA has received less attention. SA in complex, collaborative environments thus remains a challenge for the human factors community, both in relation to the development of theoretical perspectives and of valid measures and to the development of guidelines for system, training and procedure design. This article presents a review and critique of what is currently known about SA and team SA, including a comparison of the most prominent individual and team models presented in the literature. In conclusion, it is argued that recently proposed systems level distributed SA approaches are the most suited to describing and assessing SA in real world, collaborative environments.}, author = {Salmon, Paul M. and Stanton, Neville A. and Walker, Guy H. and Baber, Chris and Jenkins, Daniel P. and Mcmaster, Richard and Young, Mark S. }, citeulike-article-id = {2896241}, doi = {10.1080/14639220701561775}, journal = {Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science}, keywords = {conceptual\_analysis, conceptual\_spaces, conceptual\_structures, mental\_model, situational\_awareness}, number = {4}, pages = {297--323}, posted-at = {2008-06-15 15:31:52}, priority = {2}, publisher = {Taylor \& Francis}, title = {What really is going on? Review of situation awareness models for individuals and teams}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14639220701561775}, volume = {9}, year = {2008} }

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:2896241 L3 - citeulike-article-id:2896241 TI - What really is going on? Review of situation awareness models for individuals and teams JF - Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science VL - 9 IS - 4 SP - 297 EP - 323 PB - Taylor & Francis N2 - The concept of situation awareness (SA) is frequently described in the literature. Theoretically, it remains predominantly an individual construct and the majority of the models presented describe SA from an individual perspective. In comparison, team SA has received less attention. SA in complex, collaborative environments thus remains a challenge for the human factors community, both in relation to the development of theoretical perspectives and of valid measures and to the development of guidelines for system, training and procedure design. This article presents a review and critique of what is currently known about SA and team SA, including a comparison of the most prominent individual and team models presented in the literature. In conclusion, it is argued that recently proposed systems level distributed SA approaches are the most suited to describing and assessing SA in real world, collaborative environments. KW - conceptual_analysis KW - conceptual_spaces KW - conceptual_structures KW - mental_model KW - situational_awareness AU - Salmon, Paul AU - Stanton, Neville AU - Walker, Guy AU - Baber, Chris AU - Jenkins, Daniel AU - Mcmaster, Richard AU - Young, Mark PY - 2008/// UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14639220701561775 ER -