Responses to Discrimination: The Role of Emotion and Expectations for Emotional Regulation

@article{citeulike:2505456, abstract = {The present study examined the role of emotion in women's perceptions of discrimination and their endorsement of behavioral responses to change the status quo. In an experimental simulation involving a situation of sex discrimination, women (N = 108) were primed to experience a particular emotion (sad, angry, control condition) and were subsequently instructed to either suppress or express (or neither) their emotional responses. Women primed to feel sad and told to suppress their emotions reported the least discrimination, whereas angered women who were permitted to express themselves reported the greatest discrimination. Furthermore, when encouraged to express their emotions, women primed to feel sad were more likely to endorse normative actions to rectify the situation, whereas women induced to feel angry were more likely to endorse collective actions to change the status quo. These findings have implications for the role of emotions and expectations regarding their expression on collective action taking. 10.1177/0146167205279906}, author = {Gill, Ritu and Matheson, Kimberly }, citeulike-article-id = {2505456}, doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167205279906}, journal = {Pers Soc Psychol Bull}, keywords = {collective\_action, group\_emotion, prejudice}, month = {February}, number = {2}, pages = {149--161}, posted-at = {2008-03-11 02:56:35}, priority = {0}, title = {Responses to Discrimination: The Role of Emotion and Expectations for Emotional Regulation}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167205279906}, volume = {32}, year = {2006} }

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:2505456 L3 - citeulike-article-id:2505456 TI - Responses to Discrimination: The Role of Emotion and Expectations for Emotional Regulation JF - Pers Soc Psychol Bull VL - 32 IS - 2 SP - 149 EP - 161 N2 - The present study examined the role of emotion in women's perceptions of discrimination and their endorsement of behavioral responses to change the status quo. In an experimental simulation involving a situation of sex discrimination, women (N = 108) were primed to experience a particular emotion (sad, angry, control condition) and were subsequently instructed to either suppress or express (or neither) their emotional responses. Women primed to feel sad and told to suppress their emotions reported the least discrimination, whereas angered women who were permitted to express themselves reported the greatest discrimination. Furthermore, when encouraged to express their emotions, women primed to feel sad were more likely to endorse normative actions to rectify the situation, whereas women induced to feel angry were more likely to endorse collective actions to change the status quo. These findings have implications for the role of emotions and expectations regarding their expression on collective action taking. 10.1177/0146167205279906 KW - collective_action KW - group_emotion KW - prejudice AU - Gill, Ritu AU - Matheson, Kimberly PY - 2006/02/01/ UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167205279906 ER -