registrieren | anmelden | FAQ      [?] 
CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Recent | Unread | Search | Authors | Tags | Export

Evidence for turnover of functional noncoding DNA in mammalian genome evolution.

Genomics, Vol. 84, No. 5. (November 2004), pp. 806-813.


View FullText article


X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

There are no reviews of this article

X Notes for this article

devin has 0 private notes und 1 public note for this article.

do some alignments. estimate two parameters of interest: proportion of sites under purifying selection and the turnover rate

devin (public ) - 2007-02-09 20:07:11

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Abstract

The vast majority of the mammalian genome does not code for proteins, and a fundamental question in genomics is: What proportion of the noncoding mammalian genome is functional? Most attempts to address this issue use sequence comparisons between highly diverged mammals such as human and mouse to identify conservation due to negative selection. But such comparisons will underestimate the true proportion of functional noncoding DNA if there is turnover, if patterns of negative selection change over time. Here we test whether the inferred level of negative selection differs between different pairwise species comparisons. Using a multiple alignment of more than a megabase of contiguous sequence from eight mammalian species, we find a strong negative relationship between inferred levels of negative selection and pairwise divergence using 21 pairwise comparisons. This result suggests that there is a high rate of turnover of functional noncoding elements in the mammalian genome, so measures of functional constraint based on human-mouse comparisons may seriously underestimate the true value.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record



RIS BibTeX
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.