registrieren | anmelden | FAQ      [?] 
Recent | Unread | Search | Authors | Tags | Export

aprasads consensus [5 articles]

Neue Publikationen in aprasads Bibliothek eingetragen unter dem Bezeichner: consensus. You can also see everyone's consensus.
  • Species trees from gene trees: reconstructing Bayesian posterior distributions of a species phylogeny using estimated gene tree distributions.
    Syst Biol, Vol. 56, No. 3. (June 2007), pp. 504-514.
    by L Liu, DK Pearl
  • Visualizing Conflicting Evolutionary Hypotheses in Large Collections of Trees: Using Consensus Networks to Study the Origins of Placentals and Hexapods
    Systematic Biology, Vol. 54, No. 1. (February 2005), pp. 66-76.
    by Barbara Holland, Frederic Delsuc, Vincent Moulton
    posted to consensus mammal methods phylogenetics root tree by aprasad on 2008-02-29 04:45:59 as **
  • Very fast algorithms for evaluating the stability of ML and Bayesian phylogenetic trees from sequence data.
    Genome Inform, Vol. 13 (2002), pp. 82-92.
    by PJ Waddell, H Kishino, R Ota
    posted to bayesian bootstrap consensus methods phylogenetics by aprasad on 2008-01-17 22:48:55 as **
  • RadCon: phylogenetic tree comparison and consensus
    Bioinformatics, Vol. 16, No. 5. (1 May 2000), pp. 486-487.
    by Joseph L Thorley, Roderic D Page
    posted to consensus phylogenetics tools tree by aprasad on 2008-01-16 20:37:13 as ** along with 2 people tny sterovetta
  • Hidden Likelihood Support in Genomic Data: Can Forty-Five Wrongs Make a Right?
    Systematic Biology, Vol. 54, No. 3. (June 2005), pp. 483-492.
    by John Gatesy, Richard Baker
    posted to consensus hidden parsimony phylogenetics supertree support by aprasad on 2005-08-19 21:02:04 as **
  • Bemerkung: Sie können diese Seite wie folgt zitieren: http://www.citeulike.org/user/aprasad/tag/consensus

    RIS BibTeX
    CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.