| registrieren | anmelden | FAQ | [?] |
Discovering Predictive Association Rules(1998), pp. 274-278.
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
There are no reviews of this article
Notes for this articleooo. specifically addresses multiple comparisons problem.
Here's the deal - postulates the count of a given item (or itemset) in the dataset is a Binomial r.v. with n=# of baskets. p, is of course unknown. n is large, so can use poisson (or paper claims normal) approximation... oh so it puts both sides of the rule in the set and tests the hypothesis that they are less than the support level. zscore calculated as: obs proportion-chosen support/sqrt(supp(1-supp))
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
AbstractAssociation rule algorithms can produce a very large number of output patterns. This has raised questions of whether the set of discovered rules "overfit" the data because all the patterns that satisfy some constraints are generated (the Bonferroni effect). In other words, the question is whether some of the rules are "false discoveries" that are not statistically significant. We present a novel approach for estimating the number of "false discoveries" at any cutoff level. Empirical evaluation...
BibTeX record
RIS record