registrieren | anmelden | FAQ      [?] 

Tag user_study [23 articles]

Recent papers classified by the tag user_study.
  • The effects of graph layout
    Computer Human Interaction Conference, 1998. Proceedings. 1998 Australasian (1998), pp. 80-86.
    by HC Purchase
  • Empirical Evaluation of Aesthetics-based Graph Layout
    Empirical Software Engineering, Vol. 7, No. 3. (2002), pp. 233-255.
    by Helen C Purchase, David Carrington, Jo-Anne Allder
  • An Experimental Comparison of Force-Directed and Randomized Graph Drawing Algorithms
    (1995), pp. 76-87.
    by Franz J Brandenburg, Michael Himsholt, Christoph Rohrer
  • Human Perception of Laid-Out Graphs
    (1998), pp. 441-443.
    by Edmund Dengler, William B Cowan
  • Graph drawing aesthetics and the comprehension of UML class diagrams: an empirical study
    (2001), pp. 129-137.
    by Helen C Purchase, Matthew Mcgill, Linda Colpoys, David Carrington
  • The Effect of Graph Layout on Inference from Social Network Data
    (1996), pp. 40-51.
    by Jim Blythe, Cathleen Mcgrath, David Krackhardt
  • User Preference of Graph Layout Aesthetics: A UML Study
    (2001), pp. 5-18.
    by Helen C Purchase, Jo-Anne Allder, David A Carrington
  • Which Aesthetic has the Greatest Effect on Human Understanding?
    (1997), pp. 248-261.
    by Helen C Purchase
  • Comparing and Evaluating Layout Algorithms within GraphEd
    Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, Vol. 6, No. 3. (1995), pp. 255-273.
    by Michael Himsolt
  • The challenge of information visualization evaluation
    (2004), pp. 109-116.
    by Catherine Plaisant
  • Toward an ecology of hypertext annotation
    (1998), pp. 40-49.
    by Catherine C Marshall
  • From reading to retrieval: freeform ink annotations as queries
    (1999), pp. 19-25.
    by Gene Golovchinsky, Morgan N Price, Bill N Schilit
  • Annotation: from paper books to the digital library
    (1997), pp. 131-140.
    by Catherine C Marshall
  • Spatial hypertext and the practice of information triage
    (1997), pp. 124-133.
    by Catherine C Marshall, Frank M Shipman
  • A Collaborative Annotation Framework
    Multimedia and Expo, 2005. ICME 2005. IEEE International Conference on (2005), pp. 1346-1349.
    by B Shevade, H Sundaram, Min Yen-Kan
  • Lost in memories: interacting with photo collections on PDAs
    (2004), pp. 325-333.
    by Susumu Harada, Mor Naaman, Yee J Song, Qianying Wang, Andreas Paepcke
  • Digital libraries' support for the user's 'information journey'
    (2005), pp. 160-169.
    by Anne Adams, Ann Blandford
    posted to dl information_seeking user_study by umurthy21 on 2007-09-30 01:58:34 as ** along with 1 person ctl
  • Why we tag: motivations for annotation in mobile and online media
    (2007), pp. 971-980.
    by Morgan Ames, Mor Naaman
  • What can Studies of e-Learning Teach us about Collaboration in e-Research? Some Findings from Digital Library Studies
    Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), Vol. 15, No. 4. (August 2006), pp. 359-383.
  • Comparing faculty information seeking in teaching and research: Implications for the design of digital libraries: Research Articles
    J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., Vol. 56, No. 6. (April 2005), pp. 636-657.
    by Christine L Borgman, Laura J Smart, Kelli A Millwood, Jason R Finley, Leslie Champeny, Anne J Gilliland, Gregory H Leazer
  • Web search behavior of Internet experts and newbies
    (2000), pp. 337-346.
    by Christoph H&\#246;scher, Gerhard Strube
    posted to search thesis user_study by aliku on 2006-01-02 01:45:17 as **
  • The perfect search engine is not enough: a study of orienteering behavior in directed search
    (2004), pp. 415-422.
    by Jaime Teevan, Christine Alvarado, Mark S Ackerman, David R Karger
  • Information search and re-access strategies of experienced web users
    (2005), pp. 583-592.
    by Anne Aula, Natalie Jhaveri, Mika K&\#228;ki
  • Bemerkung: Sie können diese Seite wie folgt zitieren: http://www.citeulike.org/tag/user_study

    RIS BibTeX RSS
    CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.