registrieren | anmelden | FAQ      [?] 

Tag peer-review [39 articles]

Recent papers classified by the tag peer-review.
  • Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies.
    Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online), No. 2. (2007)
    by T Jefferson, M Rudin, S Brodney Folse, F Davidoff
    posted to peer-review review by xjlibod on 2008-07-23 18:48:15 as **
  • Taking Responsibility for Scientific Discourse
    Science, Vol. 321, No. 5892. (22 August 2008), pp. 1039c-1040.
    by Seth D Friedman
    posted to peer-review pubmed science-publishing by xjlibod on 2008-08-22 16:39:22 as **
  • The evolution of editorial peer review.
    JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 263, No. 10. (9 March 1990), pp. 1323-1329.
    by JC Burnham
    posted to history peer-review by xjlibod on 2008-07-23 18:32:31 as **
  • Journal Reviewer Ratings: Issues of Particularistic Bias, Agreement, and Predictive Validity Within the Manuscript Review Process
    Bulletin of Science Technology Society, Vol. 26, No. 3. (1 June 2006), pp. 228-242.
    by Robert P Vecchio
    posted to peer-review by taqiyya on 2008-11-30 10:18:28 as **
  • Reviewing Scientific Works In Psychology
    (2005)
    by Robert J Sternberg
    posted to peer-review by sfcheung on 2008-08-01 18:05:44 as read
  • An Algorithm to Determine Peer-Reviewers
    (24 May 2006)
    by Marko A Rodriguez, Johan Bollen
    posted to bibliometrics peer-review by scholze on 2006-07-06 14:30:24 as read along with 3 people ansobol jrw proportional
  • Co-authorship networks in the digital library research community
    Inf. Process. Manage., Vol. 41, No. 6. (December 2005), pp. 1462-1480.
    by Xiaoming Liu, Johan Bollen, Michael L Nelson, Herbert Van de Sompel
    posted to bibliometrics peer-review by scholze on 2006-07-06 14:43:32 as ** along with 3 people cmmorel gioia Simplicity
  • An Algorithm to Determine Peer-Reviewers
    (24 May 2006)
    by Marko A Rodriguez, Johan Bollen
    posted to peer-review publishing referee by pak on 2008-07-21 23:14:00 as ** along with 7 people and 1 group JSicot markusd viktor21614 dullhunk pdlug nojhan entropy Metaheuristics
  • Ten simple rules for getting published.
    PLoS Comput Biol, Vol. 1, No. 5. (October 2005)
    by PE Bourne
    posted to scholarly publishing peer-review by lesikv on 2008-10-22 18:36:16 as ** along with 26 people and 9 groups msampson monkare robertlischke schlady abellogin kimbellanderson misonneh Zephyrus marcius eckart_bindewald eweaver leonardo dullhunk cmm ewmoore nickluscombe paulclinger ucbcjbm rgb linhailue OriginalLurch rodney Torsten_Holmer elvinado mattions kristina Roswell Cancer Crosstalk FAB-lab EBI-regulation SigsitLab BioinfoCIPF SGU-CIPF pileWorks Kopelman_Group VisionLab
  • Correction and use of biomedical literature affected by scientific misconduct
    Science and Engineering Ethics, Vol. 13, No. 1. (11 March 2007), pp. 5-24.
    by Anne Neale, Justin Northrup, Rhonda Dailey, Ellen Marks, Judith Abrams
    posted to scholarly retraction publishing peer-review misconduct by lesikv on 2008-10-24 14:04:47 as **
  • A recipe for high impact
    Genome Biology, Vol. 8, No. 5. (2007)
    by Murat Cokol, Raul R Esteban, Andrey Rzhetsky
    posted to scholarly publishing peer-review impact by lesikv on 2008-10-23 14:15:48 as ** along with 3 people and 2 groups dullhunk neils grahamc Bioinformatics ParkinsonLab_at_MaRS
  • Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals.
    Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, Vol. 99, No. 4. (April 2006), pp. 178-182.
    by R Smith
    posted to peer-review by lesikv on 2008-10-22 17:17:20 as *** along with 3 people ukppdadsr fgibson dullhunk
  • Phenomena of retraction: reasons for retraction and citations to the publications.
    JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 280, No. 3. (15 July 1998), pp. 296-297.
    by JM Budd, M Sievert, TR Schultz
    posted to scholarly retraction publishing peer-review ethics citations by lesikv on 2008-10-23 15:14:24 as **
  • Scientists behaving badly
    Nature, Vol. 435, No. 7043. (08 June 2005), pp. 737-738.
    by Brian C Martinson, Melissa S Anderson, Raymond d de Vries
    posted to retraction publishing peer-review misconduct ethics by lesikv on 2008-10-23 15:05:34 as ** along with 1 person timothee
  • Falsified papers in high-impact journals were slow to retract and indistinguishable from nonfraudulent papers
    Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 61, No. 5. (May 2008), pp. 464-470.
    by N Trikalinos, E Evangelou, J Ioannidis
    posted to scholarly retraction publishing peer-review misconduct by lesikv on 2008-10-24 13:56:45 as **
  • Peer review and journal models
    (31 Aug 2006)
    by Paolo Dall'aglio
    posted to publishing peer-review by lesikv on 2008-11-05 14:21:29 as ** along with 4 people ansobol proportional MariaChiaraP gioia
  • notes Measuring article quality in wikipedia: models and evaluation
    (2007), pp. 243-252.
    by Meiqun Hu, Ee-Peng Lim, Aixin Sun, Hady W Lauw, Ba-Quy Vuong
    posted to abuse article classification classifier collaboration collaborative-authoring country dataset edits empirical encyclopedia peer-review prediction quality quality-assessment quality-assurance rigor wikipedia by krisl on 2008-07-25 00:43:35 as read along with 6 people mahart456 hongliangjie fiacobelli dtd aarontaycheehsien jfelipe
  • Results assessment and impact creation in collaborative research--An example from the ECOLEAD project
    Technovation, Vol. 27, No. 1-2. ( 2007), pp. 65-77.
    by Luis M Camarinha-Matos, Hamideh Afsarmanesh
    posted to citation_analysis peer-review publishing by kharke on 2008-06-29 21:13:11 as **
  • Using peer review in teaching computing
    (2005), pp. 321-322.
    by Edward F Gehringer, Donald D Chinn, Manuel A Perez-Quinones, Mark A Ardis
    posted to peer-review by jryall on 2006-02-12 04:07:52 as *** along with 1 group CHISEL
  • Peer Assessment between Students in Colleges and Universities
    Review of Educational Research, Vol. 68, No. 3. (1998), pp. 249-276.
    by Keith Topping
    posted to education lit-review peer-review by jryall on 2005-11-30 19:59:32 as ***** along with 1 person and 1 group MorganHill CHISEL
  • WebCoM: a tool to use peer review to improve student interaction
    J. Educ. Resour. Comput., Vol. 3, No. 1. (March 2003), pp. 1-14.
    by Elaine Silva, Dilvan Moriera
    posted to peer-review by jryall on 2006-02-12 04:09:14 as read along with 3 people and 2 groups claudiamichelle scturner amirmz CHISEL Social Web
  • Effective peer assessment for learning computer programming
    SIGCSE Bull., Vol. 36, No. 3. (September 2004), pp. 122-126.
    by Jirarat Sitthiworachart, Mike Joy
    posted to peer-review by jryall on 2005-12-20 19:47:56 as **** along with 1 group CHISEL
  • Online student peer reviews
    (2004), pp. 33-37.
    by William J Wolfe
    posted to peer-review by jryall on 2006-02-12 04:08:42 as read along with 1 group CHISEL
  • Web-based peer assessment in learning computer programming
    Advanced Learning Technologies, 2003. Proceedings. The 3rd IEEE International Conference on (2003), pp. 180-184.
    by J Sitthiworachart, M Joy
    posted to marking peer-review process user-study by jryall on 2005-12-20 19:46:04 as **** along with 3 people and 3 groups planetoid brusilovsky Huadong Ensemble (Pathway for Computing Education) CHISEL Social Web
  • Using peer review as a vehicle for communication skill development and active learning
    J. Comput. Small Coll., Vol. 21, No. 2. (December 2005), pp. 148-155.
    by Karen Anewalt
    posted to peer-review by jryall on 2006-02-12 04:10:13 as read along with 1 person and 1 group gioia CHISEL
  • Electronic peer review and peer grading in computer-science courses
    Vol. 33, No. 1. (March 2001), pp. 139-143.
    by Edward F Gehringer
    posted to peer-review by jryall on 2006-02-12 04:06:54 as read along with 1 group CHISEL
  • Painful Publishing
    Science, Vol. 321, No. 5885. (4 July 2008), 36a.
    by Martin Raff, Alexander Johnson, Peter Walter
    posted to peer-review pico problem-articulation by jago on 2008-07-04 11:24:56 as ** along with 4 people and 3 groups stringertheory dullhunk Borelli kaniko Knowledge_Economy_Reform Academic Writing, Literacies and Discourse STS
  • Scientific Journal Publications: On the Role of Electronic Preprint Exchange in the Distribution of Scientific Literature
    Social Studies of Science, Vol. 35, No. 4. (1 August 2005), pp. 549-579.
    by Kristrun Gunnarsdottir
    posted to scientific-writing publications peer-review journals experts e-publishing academy by kaniko to the group STS on 2007-07-26 12:06:33 as ** along with 2 groups Neuroscience feminist_technoscience
  • Interactive journal concept for improved scientific publishing and quality assurance
    pp. 105-113.
    by Ulrich Poschl
    posted to publishing peer-review journal by fgibson on 2008-10-12 14:31:47 as read along with 1 person gioia
  • An Incentive Solution to the Peer Review Problem
    PLoS Biology, Vol. 5, No. 4. (1 April 2007), e107.
    by Marc Hauser, Ernst Fehr
    posted to peer-review by dullhunk on 2007-10-24 13:41:32 as ** along with 1 person and 1 group kristina VisionLab
  • In Search of Peer Reviewers
    Science, Vol. 319, No. 5859. (4 January 2008), 32b.
    by William F Perrin
    posted to peer-review qotd by dullhunk on 2008-01-31 00:10:11 as ** along with 2 people sci91078 sen_cheng
  • Working double-blind
    Nature, Vol. 451, No. 7179. (7 February 2008), pp. 605-606.
    posted to peer-review by dullhunk on 2008-02-07 12:35:25 as ** along with 1 person sci91078
  • Kevin Struhl
    Current Biology, Vol. 18, No. 1. (8 January 2008), pp. R7-R9.
    by Kevin Struhl
    posted to peer-review by dullhunk on 2008-01-14 11:50:01 as **
  • Future of open access could be online and peer-reviewed
    Nature, Vol. 454, No. 7201. (10 July 2008), pp. 158-158.
    by Massimo Sandal
    posted to open-access peer-review by dullhunk on 2008-07-09 20:53:20 as **
  • Towards a Data Sharing Culture: Recommendations for Leadership from Academic Health Centers.
    PLoS medicine, Vol. 5, No. 9. (2 September 2008)
    by Heather A A Piwowar, Michael J J Becich, Howard Bilofsky, Rebecca S S Crowley,
    posted to policy peer-review open-data bibliometrics by CameronNeylon on 2008-09-21 15:48:13 as ** along with 3 people dullhunk hpiwowar HugoMarcelo
  • Systematic Variation in Reviewer Practice According to Country and Gender in the Field of Ecology and Evolution
    PLoS ONE, Vol. 3, No. 9. (2008), e3202.
    by Olyana N Grod, Amber E Budden, Tom Tregenza, Julia Koricheva, Roosa Leimu, Lonnie W Aarssen, Christopher J Lortie
    posted to peer-review bias by CameronNeylon on 2008-09-19 12:38:10 as **
  • Why Current Publication Practices May Distort Science
    PLoS Medicine, Vol. 5, No. 10. (1 October 2008), e201.
    by Neal S Young, John P Ioannidis, Omar Al-Ubaydli
    posted to publication peer-review paper negative-results economics bibliometrics bias by CameronNeylon on 2008-10-07 06:59:51 as ** along with 17 people and 2 groups fheintz vkwn stringertheory jago Zephyrus aspen tomhebbron viktor21614 j_rodriguez shoshin silberbauer reyez qwermish renatomilani cabbagesofdoom dullhunk neils Knowledge_Economy_Reform Roswell Cancer Crosstalk
  • Reviewing Peer Review
    Science, Vol. 321, No. 5885. (4 July 2008), 15.
    by Bruce Alberts, Brooks Hanson, Katrina L Kelner
    posted to peer-review publication science by Borelli on 2008-07-04 16:10:40 as ** along with 10 people and 2 groups applebyb rrbarb sen_cheng emmahe johnsonw kaniko annyork libtech7 jago HugoMarcelo Academic Writing, Literacies and Discourse STS
  • Latent Markov modelling applied to grant peer review
    (3 Apr 2006)
    by Lutz Bornmann, Ruediger Mutz, Hans-Dieter Daniel
    posted to academe grant markov-chain peer-review social statistics by ansobol on 2006-04-04 07:44:54 as **
    • Bemerkung: Sie können diese Seite wie folgt zitieren: http://www.citeulike.org/tag/peer-review

    RIS BibTeX
    CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.