<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
   xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
   xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"

>
<channel rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/about">
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 14:49:21 BST</pubDate>


	<title>CiteULike: omalbams The</title>
	<description>CiteULike: omalbams The</description>


	<link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/omalbam/author/The</link>
	<dc:publisher>CiteULike.org</dc:publisher>
	<dc:language>en-gb</dc:language>
	<dc:rights>Copyright &#169; 2004-2008 citeulike.org</dc:rights>
	<items>
    <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/omalbam/article/2881049"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/omalbam/article/2961454"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/omalbam/article/2767857"/>

	</rdf:Seq>
	</items>
	</channel>


<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/omalbam/article/2881049">
    <title>Effects of Intensive Glucose Lowering in Type 2 Diabetes</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/omalbam/article/2881049</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;N Engl J Med (6 June 2008), NEJMoa0802743.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Background Epidemiologic studies have shown a relationship between glycated hemoglobin levels and cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes. We investigated whether intensive therapy to target normal glycated hemoglobin levels would reduce cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes who had either established cardiovascular disease or additional cardiovascular risk factors. Methods In this randomized study, 10,251 patients (mean age, 62.2 years) with a median glycated hemoglobin level of 8.1% were assigned to receive intensive therapy (targeting a glycated hemoglobin level below 6.0%) or standard therapy (targeting a level from 7.0 to 7.9%). Of these patients, 38% were women, and 35% had had a previous cardiovascular event. The primary outcome was a composite of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or death from cardiovascular causes. The finding of higher mortality in the intensive-therapy group led to a discontinuation of intensive therapy after a mean of 3.5 years of follow-up. Results At 1 year, stable median glycated hemoglobin levels of 6.4% and 7.5% were achieved in the intensive-therapy group and the standard-therapy group, respectively. During follow-up, the primary outcome occurred in 352 patients in the intensive-therapy group, as compared with 371 in the standard-therapy group (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78 to 1.04; P=0.16). At the same time, 257 patients in the intensive-therapy group died, as compared with 203 patients in the standard-therapy group (hazard ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.46; P=0.04). Hypoglycemia requiring assistance and weight gain of more than 10 kg were more frequent in the intensive-therapy group (P&#60;0.001). Conclusions As compared with standard therapy, the use of intensive therapy to target normal glycated hemoglobin levels for 3.5 years increased mortality and did not significantly reduce major cardiovascular events. These findings identify a previously unrecognized harm of intensive glucose lowering in high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00000620 .) 10.1056/NEJMoa0802743</description>
    <dc:title>Effects of Intensive Glucose Lowering in Type 2 Diabetes</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>The</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0802743</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>N Engl J Med (6 June 2008), NEJMoa0802743.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-06-10T23:21:21-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2008</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>N Engl J Med</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:startingPage>NEJMoa0802743</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:category>cardiovascular</prism:category>
    <prism:category>diabetes</prism:category>
    <prism:category>insulintherapy</prism:category>
    <prism:category>rct</prism:category>
    <prism:category>risk</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/omalbam/article/2961454">
    <title>Motesanib Diphosphate in Progressive Differentiated Thyroid Cancer</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/omalbam/article/2961454</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;N Engl J Med, Vol. 359, No. 1. (3 July 2008), pp. 31-42.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Background The expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is characteristic of differentiated thyroid cancer and is associated with aggressive tumor behavior and a poor clinical outcome. Motesanib diphosphate (AMG 706) is a novel oral inhibitor of VEGF receptors, platelet-derived growth-factor receptor, and KIT. Methods In an open-label, single-group, phase 2 study, we treated 93 patients who had progressive, locally advanced or metastatic, radioiodine-resistant differentiated thyroid cancer with 125 mg of motesanib diphosphate, administered orally once daily. The primary end point was an objective response as assessed by an independent radiographic review. Additional end points included the duration of the response, progression-free survival, safety, and changes in serum thyroglobulin concentration. Results Of the 93 patients, 57 (61%) had papillary thyroid carcinoma. The objective response rate was 14%. Stable disease was achieved in 67% of the patients, and stable disease was maintained for 24 weeks or longer in 35%; 8% had progressive disease as the best response. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the median duration of the response was 32 weeks (the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval [CI] was 24; the upper limit could not be estimated because of an insufficient number of events); the estimate of median progression-free survival was 40 weeks (95% CI, 32 to 50). Among the 75 patients in whom thyroglobulin analysis was performed, 81% had decreased serum thyroglobulin concentrations during treatment, as compared with baseline levels. The most common treatment-related adverse events were diarrhea (in 59% of the patients), hypertension (56%), fatigue (46%), and weight loss (40%). Conclusions Motesanib diphosphate can induce partial responses in patients with advanced or metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer that is progressive. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00121628 .) 10.1056/NEJMoa075853</description>
    <dc:title>Motesanib Diphosphate in Progressive Differentiated Thyroid Cancer</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Steven Sherman</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Lori Wirth</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Jean-Pierre Droz</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Michael Hofmann</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Lars Bastholt</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Renato Martins</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Lisa Licitra</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Michael Eschenberg</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Yu-Nien Sun</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Todd Juan</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Daniel Stepan</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Martin Schlumberger</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>The</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1056/NEJMoa075853</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>N Engl J Med, Vol. 359, No. 1. (3 July 2008), pp. 31-42.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-07-03T22:20:46-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2008</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>N Engl J Med</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>359</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>31</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>42</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>therapy</prism:category>
    <prism:category>thyroid-ca</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/omalbam/article/2767857">
    <title>Metformin versus Insulin for the Treatment of Gestational Diabetes</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/omalbam/article/2767857</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;N Engl J Med, Vol. 358, No. 19. (8 May 2008), pp. 2003-2015.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Background Metformin is a logical treatment for women with gestational diabetes mellitus, but randomized trials to assess the efficacy and safety of its use for this condition are lacking. Methods We randomly assigned 751 women with gestational diabetes mellitus at 20 to 33 weeks of gestation to open treatment with metformin (with supplemental insulin if required) or insulin. The primary outcome was a composite of neonatal hypoglycemia, respiratory distress, need for phototherapy, birth trauma, 5-minute Apgar score less than 7, or prematurity. The trial was designed to rule out a 33% increase (from 30% to 40%) in this composite outcome in infants of women treated with metformin as compared with those treated with insulin. Secondary outcomes included neonatal anthropometric measurements, maternal glycemic control, maternal hypertensive complications, postpartum glucose tolerance, and acceptability of treatment. Results Of the 363 women assigned to metformin, 92.6% continued to receive metformin until delivery and 46.3% received supplemental insulin. The rate of the primary composite outcome was 32.0% in the group assigned to metformin and 32.2% in the insulin group (relative risk, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.90 to 1.10). More women in the metformin group than in the insulin group stated that they would choose to receive their assigned treatment again (76.6% vs. 27.2%, P&#60;0.001). The rates of other secondary outcomes did not differ significantly between the groups. There were no serious adverse events associated with the use of metformin. Conclusions In women with gestational diabetes mellitus, metformin (alone or with supplemental insulin) is not associated with increased perinatal complications as compared with insulin. The women preferred metformin to insulin treatment. (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, 12605000311651.) 10.1056/NEJMoa0707193</description>
    <dc:title>Metformin versus Insulin for the Treatment of Gestational Diabetes</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Janet Rowan</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>William Hague</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Wanzhen Gao</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Malcolm Battin</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Peter Moore</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>The</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0707193</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>N Engl J Med, Vol. 358, No. 19. (8 May 2008), pp. 2003-2015.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-05-08T02:04:07-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2008</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>N Engl J Med</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>358</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>19</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>2003</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>2015</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>diabetes</prism:category>
    <prism:category>metformin</prism:category>
    <prism:category>pregnancy</prism:category>
    <prism:category>therapy</prism:category>
</item>



</rdf:RDF>

