<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
   xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
   xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"

>
<channel rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/about">
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 04:48:37 BST</pubDate>


	<title>CiteULike: mbeisens library [3 articles]</title>
	<description>CiteULike: mbeisens library [3 articles]</description>


	<link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/mbeisen</link>
	<dc:publisher>CiteULike.org</dc:publisher>
	<dc:language>en-gb</dc:language>
	<dc:rights>Copyright &#169; 2004-2008 citeulike.org</dc:rights>
	<items>
    <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/mbeisen/article/564264"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/mbeisen/article/680"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/mbeisen/article/679"/>

	</rdf:Seq>
	</items>
	</channel>


<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/mbeisen/article/564264">
    <title>The Changing Role of the Embryo in Evolutionary Thought : Roots of Evo-Devo (Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and Biology)</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/mbeisen/article/564264</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;(14 March 2005)&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ron Amundson examines two hundred years of scientific views on the evolution-development relationship from the perspective of evolutionary developmental biology (evo-devo). This new perspective challenges several popular views about the history of evolutionary thought by claiming that many earlier authors had made history come out right for the Evolutionary Synthesis. The book starts with a revised history of nineteenth-century evolutionary thought. It then investigates how development became irrelevant with the Evolutionary Synthesis. It concludes with an examination of the contrasts that persist between mainstream evolutionary theory and evo-devo. This book will appeal to students and professionals in the philosophy and history of science, and biology.</description>
    <dc:title>The Changing Role of the Embryo in Evolutionary Thought : Roots of Evo-Devo (Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and Biology)</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Ron Amundson</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>(14 March 2005)</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-03-27T03:23:29-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2005</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publisher>Cambridge University Press</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>no-tag</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/mbeisen/article/680">
    <title>Computational identification of developmental enhancers: conservation and function of transcription factor binding-site clusters in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila pseudoobscura.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/mbeisen/article/680</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Genome Biol, Vol. 5, No. 9. (2004)&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;BACKGROUND: The identification of sequences that control transcription in metazoans is a major goal of genome analysis. In a previous study, we demonstrated that searching for clusters of predicted transcription factor binding sites could discover active regulatory sequences, and identified 37 regions of the Drosophila melanogaster genome with high densities of predicted binding sites for five transcription factors involved in anterior-posterior embryonic patterning. Nine of these clusters overlapped known enhancers. Here, we report the results of in vivo functional analysis of 27 remaining clusters. RESULTS: We generated transgenic flies carrying each cluster attached to a basal promoter and reporter gene, and assayed embryos for reporter gene expression. Six clusters are enhancers of adjacent genes: giant, fushi tarazu, odd-skipped, nubbin, squeeze and pdm2; three drive expression in patterns unrelated to those of neighboring genes; the remaining 18 do not appear to have enhancer activity. We used the Drosophila pseudoobscura genome to compare patterns of evolution in and around the 15 positive and 18 false-positive predictions. Although conservation of primary sequence cannot distinguish true from false positives, conservation of binding-site clustering accurately discriminates functional binding-site clusters from those with no function. We incorporated conservation of binding-site clustering into a new genome-wide enhancer screen, and predict several hundred new regulatory sequences, including 85 adjacent to genes with embryonic patterns. CONCLUSIONS: Measuring conservation of sequence features closely linked to function--such as binding-site clusterin--makes better use of comparative sequence data than commonly used methods that examine only sequence identity.</description>
    <dc:title>Computational identification of developmental enhancers: conservation and function of transcription factor binding-site clusters in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila pseudoobscura.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>BP Berman</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>BD Pfeiffer</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>TR Laverty</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>SL Salzberg</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>GM Rubin</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>MB Eisen</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>SE Celniker</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/gb-2004-5-9-r61</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Genome Biol, Vol. 5, No. 9. (2004)</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2004-11-22T00:17:30-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2004</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Genome Biol</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>1465-6914</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>9</prism:number>
    <prism:category>no-tag</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/mbeisen/article/679">
    <title>Conservation and Evolution of Cis-Regulatory Systems in Ascomycete Fungi.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/mbeisen/article/679</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;PLoS Biol, Vol. 2, No. 12. (9 November 2004)&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Relatively little is known about the mechanisms through which gene expression regulation evolves. To investigate this, we systematically explored the conservation of regulatory networks in fungi by examining the cis-regulatory elements that govern the expression of coregulated genes. We first identified groups of coregulated Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes enriched for genes with known upstream or downstream cis-regulatory sequences. Reasoning that many of these gene groups are coregulated in related species as well, we performed similar analyses on orthologs of coregulated S. cerevisiae genes in 13 other ascomycete species. We find that many species-specific gene groups are enriched for the same flanking regulatory sequences as those found in the orthologous gene groups from S. cerevisiae, indicating that those regulatory systems have been conserved in multiple ascomycete species. In addition to these clear cases of regulatory conservation, we find examples of cis-element evolution that suggest multiple modes of regulatory diversification, including alterations in transcription factor-binding specificity, incorporation of new gene targets into an existing regulatory system, and cooption of regulatory systems to control a different set of genes. We investigated one example in greater detail by measuring the in vitro activity of the S. cerevisiae transcription factor Rpn4p and its orthologs from Candida albicans and Neurospora crassa. Our results suggest that the DNA binding specificity of these proteins has coevolved with the sequences found upstream of the Rpn4p target genes and suggest that Rpn4p has a different function in N. crassa.</description>
    <dc:title>Conservation and Evolution of Cis-Regulatory Systems in Ascomycete Fungi.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Audrey P Gasch</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Alan M Moses</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Derek Y Chiang</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Hunter B Fraser</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Mark Berardini</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Michael B Eisen</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020398</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>PLoS Biol, Vol. 2, No. 12. (9 November 2004)</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2004-11-22T00:17:30-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2004</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>PLoS Biol</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>1544-9173</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>12</prism:number>
    <prism:category>no-tag</prism:category>
</item>



</rdf:RDF>

