<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
   xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
   xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"

>
<channel rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/about">
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 00:35:02 BST</pubDate>


	<title>CiteULike: emptyhbs Rajewsky</title>
	<description>CiteULike: emptyhbs Rajewsky</description>


	<link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/emptyhb/author/Rajewsky</link>
	<dc:publisher>CiteULike.org</dc:publisher>
	<dc:language>en-gb</dc:language>
	<dc:rights>Copyright &#169; 2004-2008 citeulike.org</dc:rights>
	<items>
    <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/emptyhb/article/876644"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/emptyhb/article/1021805"/>

	</rdf:Seq>
	</items>
	</channel>


<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/emptyhb/article/876644">
    <title>Conservation of regulatory elements between two species of Drosophila.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/emptyhb/article/876644</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;BMC Bioinformatics, Vol. 4 (20 November 2003)&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;BACKGROUND: One of the important goals in the post-genomic era is to determine the regulatory elements within the non-coding DNA of a given organism's genome. The identification of functional cis-regulatory modules has proven difficult since the component factor binding sites are small and the rules governing their arrangement are poorly understood. However, the genomes of suitably diverged species help to predict regulatory elements based on the generally accepted assumption that conserved blocks of genomic sequence are likely to be functional. To judge the efficacy of strategies that prefilter by sequence conservation it is important to know to what extent the converse assumption holds, namely that functional elements common to both species will fall within these conserved blocks. The recently completed sequence of a second Drosophila species provides an opportunity to test this assumption for one of the experimentally best studied regulatory networks in multicellular organisms, the body patterning of the fly embryo. RESULTS: We find that 50%-70% of known binding sites reside in conserved sequence blocks, but these percentages are not greatly enriched over what is expected by chance. Finally, a computational genome-wide search in both species for regulatory modules based on clusters of binding sites suggests that genes central to the regulatory network are consistently recovered. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that binding sites remain clustered for these &#34;core modules&#34; while not necessarily residing in conserved blocks. This is an important clue as to how regulatory information is encoded in the genome and how modules evolve.</description>
    <dc:title>Conservation of regulatory elements between two species of Drosophila.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>E Emberly</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>N Rajewsky</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>ED Siggia</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2105-4-57</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>BMC Bioinformatics, Vol. 4 (20 November 2003)</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-09-28T20:46:21-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2003</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>BMC Bioinformatics</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>1471-2105</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
    <prism:category>cis_regulatory_elements</prism:category>
    <prism:category>cis_regulatory_evolution</prism:category>
    <prism:category>drosophila</prism:category>
    <prism:category>motif_searching</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/emptyhb/article/1021805">
    <title>Transcriptional Control in the Segmentation Gene Network of Drosophila</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/emptyhb/article/1021805</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;PLoS Biology, Vol. 2, No. 9. (1 September 2004), e271.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The segmentation gene network of Drosophila consists of maternal and zygotic factors that generate, by transcriptional (cross-) regulation, expression patterns of increasing complexity along the anterior-posterior axis of the embryo. Using known binding site information for maternal and zygotic gap transcription factors, the computer algorithm Ahab recovers known segmentation control elements (modules) with excellent success and predicts many novel modules within the network and genome-wide. We show that novel module predictions are highly enriched in the network and typically clustered proximal to the promoter, not only upstream, but also in intronic space and downstream. When placed upstream of a reporter gene, they consistently drive patterned blastoderm expression, in most cases faithfully producing one or more pattern elements of the endogenous gene. Moreover, we demonstrate for the entire set of known and newly validated modules that Ahab&#39;s prediction of binding sites correlates well with the expression patterns produced by the modules, revealing basic rules governing their composition. Specifically, we show that maternal factors consistently act as activators and that gap factors act as repressors, except for the bimodal factor Hunchback. Our data suggest a simple context-dependent rule for its switch from repressive to activating function. Overall, the composition of modules appears well fitted to the spatiotemporal distribution of their positive and negative input factors. Finally, by comparing Ahab predictions with different categories of transcription factor input, we confirm the global regulatory structure of the segmentation gene network, but find odd skipped behaving like a primary pair-rule gene. The study expands our knowledge of the segmentation gene network by increasing the number of experimentally tested modules by 50&#37;. For the first time, the entire set of validated modules is analyzed for binding site composition under a uniform set of criteria, permitting the definition of basic composition rules. The study demonstrates that computational methods are a powerful complement to experimental approaches in the analysis of transcription networks.</description>
    <dc:title>Transcriptional Control in the Segmentation Gene Network of Drosophila</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Mark Schroeder</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Michael Pearce</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>John Fak</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Hongqing Fan</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Ulrich Unnerstall</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Eldon Emberly</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Nikolaus Rajewsky</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Eric Siggia</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Ulrike Gaul</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020271</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>PLoS Biology, Vol. 2, No. 9. (1 September 2004), e271.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-01-01T19:51:52-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2004</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>PLoS Biology</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>9</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>e271</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:category>cis_regulatory_elements</prism:category>
    <prism:category>drosophila</prism:category>
    <prism:category>motif_searching</prism:category>
    <prism:category>pattern_formation</prism:category>
    <prism:category>transcriptional_regulation</prism:category>
</item>



</rdf:RDF>

