<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
   xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
   xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"

>
<channel rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/about">
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 14:54:01 BST</pubDate>


	<title>CiteULike: Emas Stumpf</title>
	<description>CiteULike: Emas Stumpf</description>


	<link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/Ema/author/Stumpf</link>
	<dc:publisher>CiteULike.org</dc:publisher>
	<dc:language>en-gb</dc:language>
	<dc:rights>Copyright &#169; 2004-2008 citeulike.org</dc:rights>
	<items>
    <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/Ema/article/2793797"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/Ema/article/2036366"/>

	</rdf:Seq>
	</items>
	</channel>


<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/Ema/article/2793797">
    <title>Estimating the size of the human interactome</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/Ema/article/2793797</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (12 May 2008), 0708078105.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;After the completion of the human and other genome projects it emerged that the number of genes in organisms as diverse as fruit flies, nematodes, and humans does not reflect our perception of their relative complexity. Here, we provide reliable evidence that the size of protein interaction networks in different organisms appears to correlate much better with their apparent biological complexity. We develop a stable and powerful, yet simple, statistical procedure to estimate the size of the whole network from subnet data. This approach is then applied to a range of eukaryotic organisms for which extensive protein interaction data have been collected and we estimate the number of interactions in humans to be approx650,000. We find that the human interaction network is one order of magnitude bigger than the Drosophila melanogaster interactome and approx3 times bigger than in Caenorhabditis elegans. 10.1073/pnas.0708078105</description>
    <dc:title>Estimating the size of the human interactome</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Michael Stumpf</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Thomas Thorne</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Eric de Silva</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Ronald Stewart</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Hyeong An</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Michael Lappe</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Carsten Wiuf</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1073/pnas.0708078105</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (12 May 2008), 0708078105.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-05-13T07:34:25-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2008</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:startingPage>0708078105</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:category>evolution</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/Ema/article/2036366">
    <title>Using Likelihood-Free Inference to Compare Evolutionary Dynamics of the Protein Networks of H. pylori and P. falciparum</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/Ema/article/2036366</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;PLoS Computational Biology, Vol. 3, No. 11. (1 November 2007), e230.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Gene duplication with subsequent interaction divergence is one of the primary driving forces in the evolution of genetic systems. Yet little is known about the precise mechanisms and the role of duplication divergence in the evolution of protein networks from the prokaryote and eukaryote domains. We developed a novel, model-based approach for Bayesian inference on biological network data that centres on approximate Bayesian computation, or likelihood-free inference. Instead of computing the intractable likelihood of the protein network topology, our method summarizes key features of the network and, based on these, uses a MCMC algorithm to approximate the posterior distribution of the model parameters. This allowed us to reliably fit a flexible mixture model that captures hallmarks of evolution by gene duplication and subfunctionalization to protein interaction network data of Helicobacter pylori and Plasmodium falciparum. The 80&#37; credible intervals for the duplication&#8211;divergence component are &#91;0.64, 0.98&#93; for H. pylori and &#91;0.87, 0.99&#93; for P. falciparum. The remaining parameter estimates are not inconsistent with sequence data. An extensive sensitivity analysis showed that incompleteness of PIN data does not largely affect the analysis of models of protein network evolution, and that the degree sequence alone barely captures the evolutionary footprints of protein networks relative to other statistics. Our likelihood-free inference approach enables a fully Bayesian analysis of a complex and highly stochastic system that is otherwise intractable at present. Modelling the evolutionary history of PIN data, it transpires that only the simultaneous analysis of several global aspects of protein networks enables credible and consistent inference to be made from available datasets. Our results indicate that gene duplication has played a larger part in the network evolution of the eukaryote than in the prokaryote, and suggests that single gene duplications with immediate divergence alone may explain more than 60&#37; of biological network data in both domains.</description>
    <dc:title>Using Likelihood-Free Inference to Compare Evolutionary Dynamics of the Protein Networks of H. pylori and P. falciparum</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Oliver Ratmann</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Ole J&#248;rgensen</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Trevor Hinkley</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Michael Stumpf</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Sylvia Richardson</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Carsten Wiuf</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030230</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>PLoS Computational Biology, Vol. 3, No. 11. (1 November 2007), e230.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-12-01T08:59:40-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2007</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>PLoS Computational Biology</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>11</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>e230</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:category>evolution</prism:category>
</item>



</rdf:RDF>

