Why Do People Write for Wikipedia? Incentives to Contribute to Open-Content Publishing

by: Andrea Forte, Amy Bruckman

(2005)

View FullText article

No URLs defined

Reviews [Write a review of this article]

There are no reviews of this article

Find related articles from these CiteULike users

sutheimers, harperf, brusilovsky, GroupLens (group), social_navigation (group)

Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

community, contribution, incentives, wiki, wikipedia

Abstract

When people learn that we have spoken to individuals who spend up to 30 hours a week volunteering their time to research and write for an open-content encyclopedia, we often hear the same question: "Why do they do it?" The fact that this encyclopedia does not provide bylines to credit authors for their hard work makes the scenario still less fathomable. Two rounds of interviews with 22 volunteer encyclopedia writers in the fall of 2004 and spring of 2005 revealed that, in some respects, the incentive system that motivates contributions to the open-content encyclopedia Wikipedia resembles that of the scientific community. Like scientists, contributors to Wikipedia seek to collaboratively identify and publish true facts about the world. Research on the sociology of science provides a useful touchstone for considering the incentive systems embedded in the technology and culture of online communities of collaborative authorship.

@unpublished{citeulike:1875495, abstract = {When people learn that we have spoken to individuals who spend up to 30 hours a week volunteering their time to research and write for an open-content encyclopedia, we often hear the same question: "Why do they do it?" The fact that this encyclopedia does not provide bylines to credit authors for their hard work makes the scenario still less fathomable. Two rounds of interviews with 22 volunteer encyclopedia writers in the fall of 2004 and spring of 2005 revealed that, in some respects, the incentive system that motivates contributions to the open-content encyclopedia Wikipedia resembles that of the scientific community. Like scientists, contributors to Wikipedia seek to collaboratively identify and publish true facts about the world. Research on the sociology of science provides a useful touchstone for considering the incentive systems embedded in the technology and culture of online communities of collaborative authorship.}, author = {Forte, Andrea and Bruckman, Amy }, citeulike-article-id = {1875495}, keywords = {community, contribution}, posted-at = {2007-11-27 02:46:05}, priority = {2}, title = {Why Do People Write for Wikipedia? Incentives to Contribute to Open-Content Publishing}, year = {2005} }

RIS record

TY - UNPB ID - citeulike:1875495 L3 - citeulike-article-id:1875495 N2 - When people learn that we have spoken to individuals who spend up to 30 hours a week volunteering their time to research and write for an open-content encyclopedia, we often hear the same question: "Why do they do it?" The fact that this encyclopedia does not provide bylines to credit authors for their hard work makes the scenario still less fathomable. Two rounds of interviews with 22 volunteer encyclopedia writers in the fall of 2004 and spring of 2005 revealed that, in some respects, the incentive system that motivates contributions to the open-content encyclopedia Wikipedia resembles that of the scientific community. Like scientists, contributors to Wikipedia seek to collaboratively identify and publish true facts about the world. Research on the sociology of science provides a useful touchstone for considering the incentive systems embedded in the technology and culture of online communities of collaborative authorship. TI - Why Do People Write for Wikipedia? Incentives to Contribute to Open-Content Publishing KW - community KW - contribution AU - Forte, Andrea AU - Bruckman, Amy PY - 2005/// ER -

RIS BibTeX